Labeling Reality
European regulators are showing no sign of wanting to extend strict labeling laws to foods like
meat and eggs coming from animals that have eaten genetically
modified (GMO) feed. The European Union (EU) has
thresholds for how much GMO material may be present in
foods and animal feed before being labeled as biotech, but these
rules, which came into force in 2004, do not apply to meat, egg,
and dairy products derived from a GMO-fed animal. For
groups opposed to biotechnology, this exemption is a glaring
loophole in the EU's laws on GMO foods. But for the biotech
and animal feed industry, it would be unthinkable and
unacceptable to change the status quo. A European
Commission official was cited as telling Reuters that there are no plans to tighten the rules on
GMO labeling, adding, "The Commission believes this would be disproportionate. It's not on the
agenda."
Europe's biotech and feed industries back the Commission line, insisting there is no evidence
that meat or dairy products from a GMO-fed animal would qualify as genetically modified.
Alexander Doering, secretary-general of the European Compound Feed Manufacturers'
Federation was quoted as saying, "Poultry that has eaten GM maize does not become a GM bird.
There has been no scientific proof of any GM transfer to food tissue. Just by eating the stuff, the
animal does not become genetically modified." The bulk of EU feed imports, mainly soybeans
and maize, comes from countries like the United States where GMO crops are common through
the crop supply chain. Around 90 percent of the EU's imports of GMO grain and oilseeds are
used as animal feed. Feed makers say the constant need to import high-protein feed materials
makes it impossible to supply non-GMO feed on a large scale. However, there are tentative
moves by some EU meat producers towards voluntary schemes to guarantee non-GMO feed.
Britain's top retailer Tesco Plc said it recognized the difficulty for its suppliers to guarantee
meats that were based on non-GMO feed. (Reuters, 7/13/05).