|

|
|
July 2004 |
Pesticide
Potpourri
|
|
-
Florida is the second largest producer of watermelons in the United States but, this year,
southwest Florida farmers are battling what scientists are calling a mysterious disease, which
could cost growers up to $50 million this season. Dr. Pam Roberts
says the unknown disease is wiping out watermelon crops across the
state. Roberts, a researcher from the Institute of Food and Agricultural
Sciences, University of Florida, has no idea how it arrived. She and
her colleagues were trying to conduct an unrelated experiment when
their own crop was infected. Many Immokalee growers may be forced
out of business. According to Roberts, some affected fields have lost
100 percent of their production. With few clues to go on, scientists say
it's very likely this situation will get worse. Consumers can identify an infected melon by
examining the rind. Healthy watermelons have a nice, white rind on the inside, but infected ones
are yellow. In related events, the Pesticide Information Office will be conducting a Pest
Management Strategic Plan for watermelon at the SW Florida Research and Education Center
(SFREC) in Immokalee on September 15, 2004 from 10 AM to 4 PM. Please contact Mark
Mossler at 352 392-4721 if you are interested in attending. (Jessica Ritter via Agnet, 6/29/04).
|
-
The Governor of Minnesota signed legislation in late May that will ban
the use of residential fertilizer containing phosphorous on established
lawns of that state. The legislation will take effect at the beginning of
2005. New lawns, lawns deficient of phosphorous, and golf courses
will be exempted from the ban. It also will not apply to agricultural
interests. (Chemical Regulation Reporter, 6/7/04).
|
-
A state appellate court reversed a $29.5 million jury award to two
Costa Rican growers who had alleged their palm trees and ornamental plants were damaged by
benomyl (Benlate®). The court cited “adverse inference instructions”
given to the jury by the trial judge. Dupont’s lawyer stated that this
decision would impact eight other Benlate® cases still in Miami trial
court. (Chemical Regulation Reporter, 6/7/04).
|
-
In a recent journal article, researchers at Virginia Tech University
compared integrated pest management strategy versus conventional
strategy for control of German cockroach in public housing. Conventional strategy was typified
by monthly baseboard and crack treatment. The IPM strategy involved initial vacuuming of
apartments followed by monthly or quarterly applications of baits and
insect growth regulator devices. Populations of cockroach were
monitored by sticky trap. In the first month (clean-out), the average
IPM cost per unit was $14.60 while convention treatment averaged
$2.75. At the end of a year, the average cost for IPM and conventional
units were $4.06 and $1.50 per unit, respectively. However, cockroach
populations in the conventional system remained steady of the first
five months, and then had a three-fold increase during the summer. Populations in the IPM
system were significantly reduced from an average of 24.7 cockroaches per unit before treatment
to 3.9 cockroaches per unit in month four. The suppressed cockroach populations (<5/unit) in
the IPM treatment remained constant for the remaining eight months of the test. (The CPCO
Advantage, July 2004).
|
-
The Competitive Enterprise Institute has suggested that congress should become more involved
in approving regulations proposed by federal agencies because of the cumulative cost of
regulation. The federal government issued 4,148 new rules in 2003, which were reported in
71,269 pages of the Federal Register. The total cost of federal regulations is estimated to be in
excess of $800 billion. EPA is one of the most rule-producing entities, along with the USDA,
Treasury, Transportation, and Homeland Security Departments. These five groups account for
nearly half of the rules under consideration. The EPA also spends more than any agency to
enforce regulations. In 2004, the EPA is expected to spend $4.8 billion on this activity, which
accounts for 17 percent of $28.8 billion expected to be spent by all regulatory agencies
combined. (Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, 7/5/04).
|
- Progressives scored a “victory” in Vermont in April when Republican Governor James Douglas
signed a bill requiring labeling and registration of all genetically modified seeds sold in the state.
This makes Vermont the first state to legislate regulation of genetically modified organisms.
Many farmers and activists in Vermont hope the bill, considered a small but important first step,
will pave the way toward more stringent regulation of GMOs in the United States. "The biotech
industry has a stranglehold on legislatures around the country, and I think it's remarkable that we
got this done," said State Representative David Zuckerman. A member of the state's small but
influential Progressive Party Caucus, Zuckerman has spent more than six years promoting this
legislation. (http://www.ellinghuysen.com, 6/18/04).
|
-
Peanut farmers now have a biological pesticide for protecting their crops from fungi that produce
aflatoxin. A protectant developed by USDA ARS scientists recently received EPA Section 3
registration. Circle One Global, Inc. of Cuthbert, GA, the sole licensee of
the ARS treatment, will immediately begin producing the biopesticide,
called Afla-Guard®, for use in 2004. The ideal time to inoculate peanut
fields is late June or early July. The scientists made the biological
treatment from spores of a nontoxigenic strain of Aspergillus flavus that is
applied to barley kernels. The kernels are then applied to the soil beneath
the plant canopy, where the fungus colonizes the peanut and establishes
itself to compete against toxigenic strains of A. flavus that are naturally
present. Afla-Guard®, in field trials, reduced aflatoxin typically 70 to 90
percent after the first application. Repeated applications in subsequent
years reduced aflatoxin by as much as 98 percent. Circle One has
agreements with peanut shelling companies to provide Afla-Guard® to growers in Alabama and
Georgia for treatment of 7,000 to 8,000 acres this year. More will be available in future years.
Until now, there was no method available for farmers to reduce the potential for this toxin
production. Aflatoxin outbreaks occur when certain crops, like peanut and corn, are stressed by
drought conditions. (ARS News, 6/22/04).
|
-
The Charleston Belle pepper developed by the USDA ARS continues to impress researchers with
its ability to resist major root-knot nematodes afflicting the southern United
States. A recent ARS study not only confirmed the effectiveness and heat
tolerance of Charleston Belle's resistance gene, but also found that the gene
benefits nematode-susceptible vegetables rotated with the pepper. In the
study, Charleston Belle dramatically outperformed its susceptible parent,
Keystone Resistant Giant, in SC field tests. Not only did it repel
nematodes, it also protected subsequently planted (double-cropped)
susceptible squash and cucumber crops. The research showed that
Charleston Belle exhibited minimal root galling from nematode attack. Charleston Belle peppers
get their resistance from the N gene, which was obtained from a resistant pimiento pepper and
placed into Keystone cultivars to create Charleston Belle. The gene controls resistance to three
major root-knot nematode species: southern (Meloidogyne incognita), peanut (M. arenaria) and
javanese (M. javanica). The pepper's resistance may aid growers who, next year, must fight
root-knot nematodes without use of methyl bromide. Other independent studies have shown that
nematode-resistant vegetable plants - notably tomatoes - can help shield double-cropped
vegetables from nematode attack. In the ARS study, cucumber yields were 87 percent heavier
and numbers of fruit were 85 percent higher when grown after Charleston Belle than after
Keystone. Squash yields were 55 percent heavier, with 50 percent more fruit. (ARS News,
6/23/04).
|
-
A decline in atmospheric carbon dioxide more than 300 million years ago may have paved the
way for the evolution of plants with leaves. Although the genetic prerequisites for leaf
development evolved approximately 400 million years ago, leaves did not become widespread
for another 20 million years. A possible explanation for this mysterious
delay is that exceptionally high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide
prevented the earlier appearance of leaves. Plants absorb carbon dioxide,
which is necessary for photosynthesis, through pores called stomata.
Water vapor also escapes from the stomata, producing a cooling effect.
Carbon dioxide levels were high when land plants first evolved, and
therefore the plants needed relatively few stomata. This lack of pores,
however, limited cooling and large, wide leaves, which absorb large amounts of solar energy,
would have been prone to lethal overheating. As atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide declined,
the number of stomata increased, producing a cooling effect that allowed larger leaves to appear.
To test this theory, the researchers examined 300 fossil plants representing a variety of species.
Their analysis showed that average leaf size increased 25-fold between 340 and 380 million
years ago, at the same time that carbon dioxide concentration was dropping. For two of the
species, the researchers determined that this abrupt increase in leaf size coincided with an eight-fold increase in stomatal density. (PNAS Online Early Edition, 7/5/04).
|
-
Keith Kisling has traveled the world to promote United States wheat. But when it comes to
promoting his second crop, he only has to venture down the road a few miles to the store and
grill. "Danny, tell Amber the corn's ready." he said Thursday, pausing at
the lunch counter to greet a friend. By nightfall, word will have spread
around the county and into Kansas that the Kisling corn giveaway is
under way. By the end of the week, the 100,000 ears of sweet corn
growing in Kisling's two-acre field will have been picked. Much of it is
B.t. sweet corn, a hybrid that has been genetically engineered to produce
its own insecticide, which can control earworms. Kisling was quoted as
saying, "Nobody's turned down B.t. corn around here...everybody likes sweet corn. This
wouldn't be nearly as much fun if we charged them." (NewsOK, 7/4/04).
|
-
Juergen Hambrecht, chairman of German chemicals giant BASF, was cited as saying in a
newspaper interview published on July 12th that the company is mulling
moving its genetic research activities to the United States in view of
European skepticism towards genetically modified foods, adding, "If you
can't push through innovations into the market, the next step is to relocate
research and development. You have to put R&D where innovations can
be carried out. We have to make money and not only spend it. There is
no innovation without risk. No risk means no growth, no future, no fun."
(Agence France Presse, 7/12/04).
|
|
Back to Menu
|
Pesticide Information
Office Main Menu |
 |