Pesticide Information Office


Chemically Speaking; March 2002

Table of Contents:
        
        

 

 

 

Fenthion Use in Florida

On January 30, an intergovernmental meeting was held to discuss risk mitigation measures proposed by the EPA for fenthion, obtain feedback, and possibly resolve any questions or concerns identified from a draft registration document amendment. Meeting participants included USDA, Centers for Disease Control, Fish and Wildlife Service, EPA Regions 4 and 6, Office of General Counsel, and multiple EPA divisions. The meeting was very successful and well represented. The next step is to have a public stakeholder meeting to communicate the Agency's position to all interested parties.

At roughly the same time, the American Bird Conservancy (ABC), Defenders of Wildlife, and the Biodiversity Legal Foundation filed a notice of intent to sue the EPA under the Endangered Species Act. The groups contend that the use of fenthion to control adult mosquitoes poses a risk to bird populations in the state. A representative of one of the groups stated that "there are other, very effective chemicals out there that are used in other states. When you blanket a region year-round resistance builds up. We believe that, when you're fighting a war, you don't turn to your nuclear arsenal right away. You save it for severe, public health emergencies." The spokesperson also stated that ABC does not believe adulticiding is the best approach to mosquito control.

According to mosquito control officials in Florida, for developments that adjoin major conservation areas such as the Everglades and Big Cypress, aerial application is the only application process that is adequate for controlling the mosquitoes which migrate from these areas. For aerial application, there are less than a half-dozen ingredients labeled for use in Florida. These compounds are either organophosphates or synthetic pyrethroids. Resistance is known to occur to both of these classes of insecticides. Consequently, to have a proper arsenal of tools with which to control adult mosquitoes (which may carry multiple encephalitic virus', malaria, yellow fever, and dengue) a manager must have access to multiple options within and between insecticide classes.

Fenthion is registered for aerial adult mosquito control in Florida and Louisiana. The organizations (located in or near Washington D.C. and in Colorado) which intend to sue the EPA are evidently aware of the processes of resistance, yet they are advocating revoking a tool that has been employed to ensure the health of Florida populations that live near mosquito-breeding areas. Professional mosquito managers in Florida have been actively trying to educate the federal government as to why this material is needed. Unfortunately, this situation seems to be evolving from a science-based discussion into a politically charged controversy. (Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, Vol. 30, No. 15, OPMP Newest News, 2/8/02, and communications with Collier and Lee County Mosquito Districts).

 

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

Acephate Interim Document Issued

 

EPA has issued the interim risk management decision documents for the organophosphate (OP) pesticide acephate (Orthene®). Acephate is an insecticide currently registered for use on a variety of field, fruit, and vegetable crops (e.g. cotton, tobacco, cranberry, mint, sod); on ornamental plants both in greenhouses and outdoors (e.g. nonbearing fruit trees, Christmas trees, and cut flowers); on golf courses; and in food-handling establishments, hospitals, hotels and other public areas for pest control. Based on risk assessments conducted on this pesticide, EPA has concluded that acephate does not pose risk concerns in food or drinking water. By eliminating indoor residential uses and all turf uses except golf courses and sod farms, the aggregate risk from acephate fits in its own risk cup. Other risk mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce worker and ecological risks below levels of concern for reregistration. For example, for certain uses, application methods will be eliminated and application rates will be lowered. Labeling to protect honey bees will be required, as will labeling to reduce potential spray drift.

Further mitigation of acephate uses may be necessary to reduce risks from methamidophos (Monitor®) residues that result from acephate applications, since acephate forms methamidophos as a break-down product. Once the methamidophos interim document is complete, the Agency will determine whether the methamidophos exposure resulting from acephate use poses risk concerns. Any potential further mitigation will be discussed at the time the methamidophos document is released. EPA is currently completing the cumulative risk assessment for the OP pesticides and will complete the reregistration decision for acephate after consideration of cumulative risks. The risk assessment and risk management documents for acephate are available at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/op/acephate.htm. (EPA OPP Update, 2/11/02).

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

 

Chromated Copper Arsenate Saga

On February 12, EPA Administrator Whitman announced a voluntary decision by industry to move consumer use of treated lumber products away from a variety of pressure-treated wood that contains arsenic by December 31, 2003, in favor of new alternative wood preservatives. This transition affects virtually all residential uses of wood treated with chromated copper arsenate, also known as CCA, including wood used in play-structures, decks, picnic tables, landscaping timbers, residential fencing, patios and walkways/boardwalks. By January 2004, EPA will not allow CCA products for any of these residential uses.

The transition period will provide consumers with increasingly more non-CCA treated wood alternatives as the industry undergoes conversion and retooling of their industrial equipment and practices, while also allowing adequate time to convert treatment plants with minimal economic disruption for the industry's employees. Beginning immediately, and over the next 22 months, wood treatment plants will convert to new alternative wood preservatives that do not contain arsenic. In the current year, manufacturers expect a decline in production of CCA products for affected residential uses up to 25 percent, with a corresponding shift to alternatives. During 2003, the companies expect the transition away from CCA to continue and increase, with a decline in production of CCA products for affected residential uses up to 70 percent, with a corresponding shift to alternatives. New labeling will be required on all CCA products, specifying that no use of CCA will be allowed by the wood-treating industry for the affected residential uses after December 31, 2003.

EPA has not concluded that CCA-treated wood poses unreasonable risks to the public for existing CCA-treated wood being used around or near their homes or from wood that remains available in stores. EPA does not believe there is any reason to remove or replace CCA-treated structures, including decks or playground equipment. EPA is not recommending that existing structures or surrounding soils be removed or replaced. While available data are very limited, some studies suggest that applying certain penetrating coatings (e.g. oil-based semi-transparent stains) on a regular basis (one application per year or every other year depending upon wear and weathering) may reduce the migration of wood preservative chemicals from CCA-treated wood. Arsenic is a known human carcinogen and, thus, the Agency believes that any reduction in the levels of potential exposure to arsenic is desirable. As always, when children play outside, whether around CCA-treated play structures or not, they should wash their hands prior to eating. Also, food should not be placed directly on any treated wood surface. Wood treated with CCA should never be burned, as toxic chemicals may be released as part of the smoke and ashes. Consumers who work with CCA-treated wood are encouraged to use common sense in order to reduce any potential exposure to chemicals in the wood. Specific actions include sawing, sanding and machining CCA-treated wood outdoors, and wearing a dust mask, goggles and gloves when performing this type of activity. Sawdust, scraps and other construction debris must be cleaned up thoroughly and disposed of in the trash (i.e., municipal solid waste). Do not compost or mulch sawdust or remnants from CCA-treated wood. Those working with the wood should wash all exposed areas of their bodies thoroughly with soap and water before eating, drinking, or using tobacco products. Work clothes should be washed separately from other household clothing before wearing them again.

Senator Nelson (FL) does not believe this schedule is sufficient and wants to legislate a different transition schedule. His bill would require the EPA to promulgate regulations to phase out production of residential CCA lumber, and prohibit production of the lumber, no later than one year after enactment. The EPA would also have to produce a public risk assessment by June 15, 2002, in conjunction with the Consumer Product Safety Commission and develop educational programs for consumers, municipalities, and schools as well as enact a pilot program to provide funding and technical assistance to schools in removing playground and other equipment containing CCA lumber. The bill would direct discarded CCA lumber to lined landfills that have a leachate system and groundwater monitoring. The material is currently exempted by EPA from hazardous waste requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act when it is disposed by end-users. (EPA OPP Update, 2/12/02 & Chemical Regulation Reporter, Vol. 26, No. 8).

 

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

Pesticide Registrations and Actions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

Pesticide Potpourri

 

 

 

 

Collier/Lee/Hendry - April 23, 2002 - Location: Immokalee Landfill, 700 Stockade Road (off Hwy 846), Immokalee. Contact: Gary Morocco, Collier County Solid Waste (941) 732-2508.

Charlotte/Sarasota/Glades
- April 24, 2002 - Location: Zemel Road Landfill, Zemel Road, Punta Gorda. Contact - Barbara Kula (941) 764-4380.

Cleansweep is NOT FOR HOMEOWNERS. If homeowners show up, they will be directed to their county Household Hazardous Waste Program or to the Solid Waste Department. Participants who bring other hazardous waste, i.e. auto batteries or used oil, will also be directed to their county HHW or Solid Waste Department. To provide information about your county's HHW program to Cleansweep participants, please contact Irene Gleason at 850-921-9221 or at Irene.Gleason@dep.state.fl.us.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

 


This home page is maintained by the Pesticide Information Office

* Mark Mossler  
Pest Management Information
Specialist 

mamossler@mail.ifas.ufl.edu 

O. Norman Nesheim
Pesticide Information Coordinator


onnesheim@mail.ifas.ufl.edu

[FSHN Home Page]
Created March 2002

 

Hit Counter