Pesticide Information Office


Chemically Speaking; February 2002

Table of Contents:
        
        

 

 

 

 

EPA Subcommittee Debates Site Security

Members of the Accident Prevention Subcommittee met in late January to discuss possible solutions to the risk of potential accidents and terrorist attacks at chemical plants. One concept shared by the group is that no barrier may be insurmountable for a determined terrorist. The director of EPA's Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Act stated that "All you need to do is to get a bunch of smart people around a table thinking about what could happen. It's not very long before you're in a magical world where anything can happen. Knowing we can't deal with the threat, we want to focus on vulnerabilities."

One group member noted that voluntary, legislative, and regulatory approaches have both weaknesses and strengths. A bill currently in the senate (see Nov.-Dec. 2001 Chemically Speaking) would require EPA to identify potential terrorist targets and make companies keep records on them. However, another member questioned why congress is giving EPA responsibility for security in the first place. "Has anyone stood up and said, 'Why us?' EPA is not a security agency. This is not a chemical security issue. It's a site security issue that happens to involve chemicals. It might be more appropriate to go with a classic security agency and bring in some chemical expertise, rather than use a chemical regulatory agency."

Certain members of the group wanted greater proof that industry is considering inherently safer technologies for its plants. This concept would have a senior corporate official verify that the company had considered safer technologies, and when necessary, explain why the company had chosen not to adopt them. Other members stated that by reducing threshold quantities, inventories would be reduced. However, this would lead to a greater number of shipments of hazardous substances, and greater burden for transportation officials. The meeting concluded with the consensus that increased plant security and safer technology may be a two-pronged plan that would increase safety at chemical plants. (Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, Vol. 30, No. 14).

 

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

Clopyralid Persistence in Compost Addressed by Manufacturer and State Agencies

After an intense media campaign by the Grass Roots Recycling Network, Dow AgroSciences and state regulators have been working with the EPA to address concerns regarding the presence of clopyralid in finished compost. The material was first detected at biologically-damaging concentrations in compost in 1999. By 2001, the Washington Agricultural Department reported that it was found in compost at five facilities in western Washington at levels "well in excess of amounts that have been shown to impact sensitive plants." Both solanaceous and legume crops are sensitive to the herbicide.

  Clopyralid is used in Washington to control Canada thistle and yellow starthistle in timothy hay and wheat and for long-term clover and dandelion control on golf courses. Clopyralid is also part of a three-way herbicide mix used on cool-season grasses. Users of clopyralid are not supposed to compost turf treated with the herbicide, a restriction that is on the products' labels. However, homeowners who get commercial pesticide applicators to treat their lawns may not know what chemicals were applied and then recycle the clippings. Appropriate means of dealing with the clippings are to leave them on the lawn (mulching) or to compost at the residential site and use the compost as top-dressing for the lawn.

Washington state is considering a range of options which include banning the herbicide or banning materials treated with it at compost facilities; and Dow has temporarily stopped the sale of clopyralid products in the Spokane area. Dow also is working on three possible solutions to correct the problem. First, there may be changes in how the products are used, such as the number of applications per year, the rate of application, and the timing of the application. Second, educational programs may be developed which relate to the no-composting label requirements. Finally, the company also is researching a potential technological fix of reintroducing bacteria into the composting process. (Chemical Regulation Reporter, Vol. 26, No.2).

Back to Table of Contents

 

 

Organic Pesticide Options May Shrink in October

The guidelines for the USDA's National Organic Program and the use of low-risk pesticides become effective as of October 21, 2002. By that time, pesticide products must be formulated with inert ingredients which are present on List 4 (those of minimal hazard or risk). Lists 1 through 3 contain those inert ingredients of toxicological concern, those that are potentially toxic and are a high priority for testing, and those of unknown toxicity, respectively.

Biopesticide manufacturers and the Organic Trade Association are hoping that the EPA moves as quickly as possible in reclassifying products on List 3 to List 4. There are about 40 inert ingredients currently in use for formulating biopesticides which are on List 3. Some of the products affected include copper fungicides, botanicals like neem, and microbials. A member of the Biopesticide Industry Alliance's Regulatory Affairs Committee stated that the List 3 inert ingredients have been presumed to be safe by the manufacturers to this point. (Chemically Regulation Reporter, Vol. 26, No. 2).

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

 

Genetically Modified Grass on the Way

The U.S.'s largest producer of lawn and garden products was cited as saying it's ready to sell genetically altered grass that will require less cutting and withstand repeated doses of weed killers. But first, The Scotts Co. faces a challenge from environmentalists who say the new product represents dangerous biological tinkering that will fundamentally alter nature. Scotts plans to ask the U.S. Department of Agriculture this spring for permission to sell its first batch of low-maintenance grass. The company also is developing genetically modified petunias and other flowers that bloom longer. Mark Schwartz, senior vice president for strategic planning at Scotts, was quoted as telling The Columbus Dispatch that, "We are excited about it because our customers are excited about it. Instead of spending two hours every Saturday mowing your lawn, you could be out playing golf or spending time with your kids."

However, a money manager who wants Scotts to delay its bid to sell genetically modified grass, was quoted as saying, "There hasn't been enough long-term testing of the potential effects these plants could have on the environment." The story says that at Scotts' annual shareholders meeting last month, the manager was unsuccessful in an effort to gain approval for a resolution demanding more study of potential environmental and financial risks related to the new products. The American Society of Landscape Architects has petitioned the USDA for independent research into the new grasses that Scotts and other companies are testing. Companies involved in biotechnology must ask the USDA for permission to plant, transport or sell their experimental plants. Len Hopper, chief landscape architect for the New York City Housing Authority, was quoted as saying, "We think the public would benefit from oversight by people who don't have a financial stake in this. We're talking about grass here, not something they're trying to develop to feed starving people." Scotts officials said their new grasses will benefit the environment by reducing the need for chemical treatments and curbing air pollution from lawn mowers. Scotts formed a partnership with Monsanto in 1998 to develop the new grass and flower varieties. (Associated Press, 2/3/02).

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

Pesticide Registrations and Actions

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Table of Contents

 

Pesticide Potpourri

  • Valent BioSciences Corporation has licensed DeVine® biological herbicide (Phytophthora palmivora) to Encore Technologies of Minneapolis, MN. Encore has exclusive rights to manufacture and market the herbicide, which controls milkweed (strangler) vine in citrus crops. (The Grower, January, 2002).

 

  • The Pesticide Information Office was recently contacted regarding use of a phenoxy tri-mix that someone had purchased from a NY-based business through an unsolicited telephone sale. The person that purchased the herbicide described to the sales person that he wanted a material for conifer release. The sales person assured him that the material "would do that" and that it would provide six seasons of control. Upon receiving the gallon of material in the mail, the buyer did not see conifer release on the label, and it indeed was absent. Each of the three herbicides in the mix (2,4-D, 2,4-DP, and MCPP) were present at a concentration of about 4.5 percent. Other products that contain these active ingredients are labeled for conifer release. This is an example of a product sale wherein verbal claims were not substantiated by the label, and there has been a history of this type of questionable selling tactic throughout the nation. We urge people to seek information from reputable sources when acquiring pesticides.

 

  • Pesticide industry sources are carefully monitoring the movement of a draft "Maryland Pesticide Safety" bill penned by a non-governmental organization in its effort to identify activist-led anti-industry regulations developed under the guise of strengthening safeguards against terrorism. In short, the proposal's requirements include overly burdensome practices for applicators/distributors and their facilities/equipment. Criminal background checks for all employees having anything to do with pesticides, 24/7 physical or close circuit camera monitoring of all sites, and dismantling aircraft and trucks used for deliveries or application of product between trips are part of the bill. Additionally, banning aerial applications near urban areas (thereby restricting important segments of mosquito control in parts of MD), pesticide formulation disclosure, and a fund for user fees and enforcement fines are included in the proposal. (CropLife America email, 1/24/02).

 

  • Two Canadian organic growers have filed a class action lawsuit against Monsanto and Aventis, seeking compensation for damages caused by genetically-modified canola pollen blowing into their fields. A spokesperson for the Saskatchewan Organic Directorate (SOD) stated that "Any kind of science, whatever it is, if it's infringing on our rights, they don't have a right to do it." The SOD official said the damage would be "in the millions" (of dollars). Approximately 60 percent of the canola grown in Saskatchewan is genetically modified to resist a herbicide. (Reuters, 1/10/02).

 

  • In two separate stories, citrus canker has now been detected in the Indian River area and in DeSoto County. Canker lesions were confirmed from two grapefruit trees in adjacent yards in Palm Bay (Brevard County) and inspectors were trying to find the inoculum source. Unlike in South Florida, Palm Bay residents were largely supportive of the eradication efforts. Similarly, a grower in DeSoto County was supportive of the program even as he watched 680 acres of prime citrus felled. So far, 801 acres of citrus have been destroyed in DeSoto County over the past few weeks. (Associated Press, 1/29/02 & Gainesville Sun, 2/4/02).

 

  • Although still under investigation, exposure to phosphine gas appears to have caused two deaths in Enterprise, AL. Apparently, someone obtained tablets containing aluminum phosphide and used them within a residence to control pests. Later, the persons' mother and nephew were found dead in the house. Aluminum phosphide is a restricted-use pesticide, only available for sale and use by certified applicators. It is only to be used for control of stored grain pests in commercial storage and food processing areas and for rodents in orchards and crop land. (OPMP Newest News, 1/25/02).

 

  • The EPA has reviewed a request by the state of Florida for the emergency use of thiophanate-methyl (Topsin®) to manage postbloom fruit drop on citrus. The request follows the voluntary cancellation of benomyl by the manufacturer in 2001. Benomyl had been the preferred fungicide to manage this disease, which can be severe in years with high rainfall during the bloom period. While azoxystrobin is also used for disease management, data suggested that with high rainfall, benomyl was superior in preventing fruit loss and reducing inoculum for subsequent infections. The Agency determined that a significant economic loss would occur if weather conditions are conducive for disease development. Thiophanate-methyl is expected to perform with similar efficacy to benomyl, as both fungicides have the same active degradation product - carbendazim. (OPMP Newest News, 1/18/02).

 

  • In order to determine whether surveys such as National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) or Doane provide biased estimates of pesticide use, an analysis was performed to examine the reliability of pesticide usage statistics obtained from these data sources commonly used by EPA. Average active ingredient rate and percent of crop treated from both Doane Market Research and NASS Agricultural Chemical Usage Reports were compared with pesticide census data reported to the California EPA. The USEPA found no significant evidence to conclude that NASS or Doane routinely underestimate or overestimate actual pesticide use. (OPMP Newest News, 1/18/02).

 

  • On January 31, the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) received an application from Arvesta Corporation (formerly Tomen Agro) to register the methyl bromide alternative, iodomethane. This compound has shown great promise in IR-4 efficacy trials as a "drop-in" replacement for methyl bromide. With the January 1, 2003, methyl bromide phase-down approaching (when methyl bromide production will be phased-down to 30% of 1991 production levels), OPP has committed to expedite the review of this new compound. (OPMP Newest News, 2/1/02).

 

  • Representatives from OPP's Biological and Economic Analysis and Registration Divisions met with representatives from the California Strawberry Commission to discuss the user group's feedback on the draft methyl bromide critical use exemption application (see Jan. 2002 Chemically Speaking). At a stakeholders meeting in mid-January, the Commission volunteered to serve as the "test candidate" for the critical use exemption application. The group spent several weeks preparing a draft response, identifying the sources of data they would need to complete the application, and identifying the burden on the group in developing their response. The Commission shared their feedback on the application, explained where they had difficulties, and offered suggestions on how to better word the instructions for certain sections of the application to provide greater clarity. Agency staff appreciated the frank and honest feedback provided by the Commission and believes that this exercise will only strengthen the ultimate application that will be submitted for approval by the Office of Management and Budget. (OPMP Newest News, 2/1/02).

 

  • A year-end compilation released by eco-terrorist Animal Liberation Front cites 137 arsons, tree spikings, laboratory attacks, and other illegal acts by such groups in 2001, according to a Seattle Times article of Jan. 16. The spokesman for ALF boasted that new U.S. and Canadian anti-terrorism laws will not shut down the movement to "save the animals and environment." (CropLife America Spotlight, 1/25/02).
 

Back to Table of Contents

 

 


This home page is maintained by the Pesticide Information Office

* Mark Mossler  
Pest Management Information
Specialist 

mamossler@mail.ifas.ufl.edu 

O. Norman Nesheim
Pesticide Information Coordinator


onnesheim@mail.ifas.ufl.edu

[FSHN Home Page]


Created February 2002

 

Hit Counter